Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.

Objective. In this experimental work we compared the determination of absorbed dose to water using four ionization chambers (ICs), a PTW-34045 Advanced Markus, a PTW-34001 Roos, an IBA-PPC05 and a PTW-30012 Farmer, irradiated under the same conditions in one continuous- and in two pulsed-scanned proton beams.Approach. The ICs were positioned at 2 cm depth in a water phantom in four square-field single-energy scanned-proton beams with nominal energies between 80 and 220 MeV and in the middle of 10 × 10 × 10 cm3dose cubes centered at 10 cm or 12.5 cm depth in water. The water-equivalent thickness (WET) of the entrance window and the effective point of measurement was considered when positioning the plane parallel (PP) ICs and the cylindrical ICs, respectively. To reduce uncertainties, all ICs were calibrated at the same primary standards laboratory. We used the beam quality (kQ) correction factors for the ICs under investigation from IAEA TRS-398, the newly calculated Monte Carlo (MC) values and the anticipated IAEA TRS-398 updated recommendations.Main results. Dose differences among the four ICs ranged between 1.5% and 3.7% using both the TRS-398 and the newly recommendedkQvalues. The spread among the chambers is reduced with the newlykQvalues. The largest differences were observed between the rest of the ICs and the IBA-PPC05 IC, obtaining lower dose with the IBA-PPC05.Significance. We provide experimental data comparing different types of chambers in different proton beam qualities. The observed dose differences between the ICs appear to be related to inconsistencies in the determination of thekQvalues. For PP ICs, MC studies account for the physical thickness of the entrance window rather than the WET. The additional energy loss that the wall material invokes is not negligible for the IBA-PPC05 and might partially explain the lowkQvalues determined for this IC. To resolve this inconsistency and to benchmark MC values,kQvalues measured using calorimetry are needed.

Monte Carlo modelling of a prototype small-body portable graphite calorimeter for ultra-high dose rate proton beams.

Background and purpose: Accurate dosimetry in Ultra-High Dose Rate (UHDR) beams is challenging because high levels of ion recombination occur within ionisation chambers used as reference dosimeters. A Small-body Portable Graphite Calorimeter (SPGC) exhibiting a dose-rate independent response was built to offer reduced uncertainty on secondary standard dosimetry in UHDR regimes. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of the geometry and material properties of the device on the dose measurement. Materials and methods: A detailed model of the SPGC was built in the Monte Carlo code TOPAS (v3.6.1) to derive the impurity and gap correction factors, kimp and kgap. A dose conversion factor, DwMC/DgMC, was also calculated using FLUKA (v2021.2.0). These factors convert the average dose to its graphite core to the dose-to-water for a 249.7 MeV mono-energetic spot-scanned clinical proton beam. The effect of the surrounding Styrofoam on the dose measurement was examined in the simulations by substituting it for graphite. Results: The kimp and kgap correction factors were 0.9993 ± 0.0002 and 1.0000 ± 0.0001, respectively when the Styrofoam was not substituted, and 1.0037 ± 0.0002 and 0.9999 ± 0.0001, respectively when substituted for graphite. The dose conversion factor was calculated to be 1.0806 ± 0.0001. All uncertainties are Type A. Conclusions: Impurity and gap correction factors, and the dose conversion factor were calculated for the SPGC in a FLASH proton beam. Separating out the effect of scatter from Styrofoam insulation showed this as the dominating correction factor, amounting to 1.0043 ± 0.0002.

First microdosimetric measurements with a tissue-equivalent proportional counter at the MedAustron ion-beam therapy facility.

The aim of this work is to present the first microdosimetric spectra measured with a miniaturised tissue-equivalent proportional counter in the clinical environment of the MedAustron ion-beam therapy facility. These spectra were gathered with a 62.4-MeV proton beam and have been compared with microdosimetric spectra measured in the 62-MeV clinical proton beam of the CATANA beam line. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the Geant4 toolkit GATE and a fully commissioned clinical beam line model. Finally, similarities and discrepancies of the measured data to simulations based on a simple and complex detector geometry are discussed.

MR-guided ion therapy: Detector response in magnetic fields during carbon ion irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Combining carbon ion therapy with on-bed MR imaging has the potential to bring particle therapy to a new level of precision. However, the introduction of magnetic fields brings challenges for dosimetry and quality assurance. For protons, a small, but significant change in detector response was shown in the presence of magnetic fields previously. For carbon ion beams, so far no such experiments have been performed. PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of external magnetic fields on the response of air-filled ionization chambers. METHODS: Four commercially available ionization chambers, three thimble type (Farmer, Semiflex, and PinPoint), and a plane parallel (Bragg peak) detector were investigated. Detectors were aligned in water such that their effective point of measurement was located at 2 cm depth. Irradiations were performed using 10 × 10 cm 2 $10\times 10\nobreakspace \mathrm{cm}^2$ square fields for carbon ions of 186.1, 272.5, and 402.8 MeV/u employing magnetic field strengths of 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 T. In addition, the detector response for protons and carbon ions was compared taking into account the secondary electron spectra and employing protons of 252.7 MeV for comparison. RESULTS: For all four detectors, a statistically significant change in detector response, dependent on the magnetic field strength, was found. The effect was more pronounced for higher energies. The highest effects were found at 0.5 T for the PinPoint detector with a change in detector response of 1.1%. The response of different detector types appeared to be related to the cavity diameter. For proton and carbon ion irradiation with similar secondary electron spectra, the change in detector response was larger for carbon ions compared to protons. CONCLUSION: A small, but significant dependence of the detector response was found for carbon ion irradiation in a magnetic field. The effect was found to be larger for smaller cavity diameters and at medium magnetic field strengths. Changes in detector response were more pronounced for carbon ions compared to protons.

3D printed 2D range modulators preserve radiation quality on a microdosimetric scale in proton and carbon ion beams.

INTRODUCTION: Particle therapy using pencil beam scanning (PBS) faces large uncertain- ties related to ranges and target motion. One possibility to improve existing mitigation strategies is a 2D range modulator (2DRM). A 2DRM offers faster irradiation times by reducing the number of layers and spots needed to create a spread-out Bragg peak. We have investigated the impact of 2DRM on microdosimetric spectra measured in proton and carbon ion beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two 2DRMs were designed and 3D printed, one for. 124.7 MeV protons and one for 238.6 MeV/u carbon ions. Their dosimetric validation was performed using Roos and PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 films. Monte Carlo simulations were done using GATE. A silicon-based solid-state microdosimeter was used to collect pulse-height spectra along three depths for two irradiation modalities, PBS and a single central beam. RESULTS: For both particle types, the original pin design had to be optimized via GATE simulations. The difference between the R80 of the simulated and measured depth dose curve was 0.1 mm. The microdosimetric spectra collected with the two irradiation modalities overlap well. Their mean lineal energy values differ over all positions by 5.2 % for the proton 2DRM and 2.1 % for the carbon ion 2DRM. CONCLUSION: Radiation quality in terms of lineal energy was independent of the irradiation method. This supports the current approach in reference dosimetry, where the residual range is chosen as a beam quality index to select stopping power ratios.

Absolute dosimetry for FLASH proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy.

A paradigm shift is occurring in clinical oncology exploiting the recent discovery that short pulses of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation-FLASH radiotherapy-can significantly spare healthy tissues whilst still being at least as effective in curing cancer as radiotherapy at conventional dose rates. These properties promise reduced post-treatment complications, whilst improving patient access to proton beam radiotherapy and reducing costs. However, accurate dosimetry at UHDR is extremely complicated. This work presents measurements performed with a primary-standard proton calorimeter and derivation of the required correction factors needed to determine absolute dose for FLASH proton beam radiotherapy with an uncertainty of 0.9% (1[Formula: see text]), in line with that of conventional treatments. The establishment of a primary standard for FLASH proton radiotherapy improves accuracy and consistency of the dose delivered and is crucial for the safe implementation of clinical trials, and beyond, for this new treatment modality.

State-of-the-art and potential of experimental microdosimetry in ion-beam therapy.

In radiotherapy, radiation-quality should be an expression of the biological and physical characteristics of ionizing radiation such as spatial distribution of ionization or energy deposition. Linear energy transfer (LET) and lineal energy (y) are two descriptors used to quantify the radiation quality. These two quantities are connected and exhibit similar features. In ion-beam therapy (IBT), lineal energy can be measured with microdosimeters, which are specifically designed to cope with the high fluence of particles in clinical beams, while the quantification of LET is generally based on calculations. In pre-clinical studies, microdosimetric spectra are used for the indirect determination of relative biological effectiveness (RBE), e.g., using the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) or biophysical response functions. In this context it is important to consider saturation effects, which occur when the highest values of y become less biologically relevant compared to the relative contribution they make to the physical dose. Recent clinical data suggests that local tumor control and normal tissue effects can be linked to macroscopic and microscopic dosimetry parameters. In particular, positive clinical outcomes have been correlated to the highest LET values in the density distribution, and there is no evident link to the saturation discussed above. A systematic collection of microdosimetric information in combination with clinical data in retrospective studies may clarify the role of radiation quality at the highest LET. In the clinical setting, microdosimetry is not widely used yet, despite its potential to be linked with LET by experimentally-determined y values. Through this connection, both play an important role in complex therapy techniques such as intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT), LET-painting and multi-ion optimization. This review summarizes the current state of microdosimetry for IBT and its potential, as well as research and development needed to make experimental microdosimetry a mature procedure in a clinical context.

Implementation of Sphinx/Lynx as daily QA equipment for scanned proton and carbon ion beams.

PURPOSE: Reporting on the first implementation of a proton dedicated commercial device (IBA Sphinx/Lynx) for daily Quality Assurance (QA) of scanned proton and carbon ion beams. METHODS: Daily QA trendlines over more than 3 years for protons and more than 2 years for carbon ions have been acquired. Key daily QA parameters were reviewed, namely the spot size and position, beam range, Bragg peak width, coincidence (between beam and imaging system isocenters), homogeneity and dose. RESULTS: The performance of the QA equipment for protons and carbon ions was evaluated. Daily QA trendlines allowed us to detect machine performance drifts and changes. The definition of tolerances and action levels is provided and compared with levels used in the literature. CONCLUSION: The device has been successfully implemented for routine daily QA activities in a dual particle therapy facility for more than 2 years. It improved the efficiency of daily QA and provides a comprehensive QA process.

Prioritizing clinical trial quality assurance for photons and protons: A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) comparison.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Global Clinical Trials RTQA Harmonization Group (GHG) set out to evaluate and prioritize clinical trial quality assurance. METHODS: The GHG compiled a list of radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) tests performed for proton and photon therapy clinical trials. These tests were compared between modalities to assess whether there was a need for different types of assessments per modality. A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed to assess the risk of each QA failure. RESULTS: The risk analysis showed that proton and photon therapy shared four out of five of their highest-risk failures (end-to-end anthropomorphic phantom test, phantom tests using respiratory motion, pre-treatment patient plan review of contouring/outlining, and on-treatment/post-treatment patient plan review of dosimetric coverage). While similar trends were observed, proton therapy had higher risk failures, driven by higher severity scores. A sub-analysis of occurrence × severity scores identified high-risk scores to prioritize for improvements in RTQA detectability. A novel severity scaler was introduced to account for the number of patients affected by each failure. This scaler did not substantially alter the ranking of tests, but it elevated the QA program evaluation to the top 20th percentile. This is the first FMEA performed for clinical trial quality assurance. CONCLUSION: The identification of high-risk errors associated with clinical trials is valuable to prioritize and reduce errors in radiotherapy and improve the quality of trial data and outcomes, and can be applied to optimize clinical radiotherapy QA.

Small field proton irradiation for in vivo studies: Potential and limitations when adapting clinical infrastructure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy for small field proton irradiation relevant for pre-clinical in vivo studies using clinical infrastructure and technology. In this context additional beam collimation and range reduction was implemented. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical proton beam line employing pencil beam scanning (PBS) was adapted for the irradiation of small fields at shallow depths. Cylindrical collimators with apertures of 15, 12, 7 and 5mm as well as two different range shifter types, placed at different distances relative to the target, were tested: a bolus range shifter (BRS) attached to the collimator and a clinical nozzle mounted range shifter (CRS) placed at a distance of 72cm from the collimator. The Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation engine implemented in the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) was commissioned for these two additional hardware components. The study was conducted with a phantom and cylindrical target sizes between 2 and 25mm in diameter following a dosimetric end-to-end test concept. RESULTS: The setup with the CRS provided a uniform dose distribution across the target. An agreement of better than5% between the planned dose and the measurements was obtained for a target with 3mm diameter (collimator 5mm). A 2mm difference between the collimator and the target diameter (target being 2 mm smaller than the collimator) sufficed to cover the whole target with the planned dose in the setup with CRS. Using the BRS setup (target 8mm, collimator 12mm) resulted in non-homogeneous dose distributions, with a dose discrepancy of up to 10% between the planned and measured doses. CONCLUSION: The clinical proton infrastructure with adequate beam line adaptations and a state-of-the-art TPS based on MC dose calculations enables small animal irradiations with a high dosimetric precision and accuracy for target sizes down to 3mm.

Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.

Objective. To review the currently available data on beam quality correction factors,kQ,for ionization chambers in clinical proton beams and derive their current best estimates for the updated recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice.Approach. The reviewed data come from 20 publications from whichkQvalues can be derived either directly from calorimeter measurements, indirectly from comparison with other chambers or from Monte Carlo calculated overall chamber factors,fQ.For cylindrical ionization chambers, a distinction is made between data obtained in the centre of a spread-out Bragg peak and those obtained in the plateau region of single-energy fields. For the latter, the effect of depth dose gradients has to be considered. To this end an empirical model for previously published displacement correction factors for single-layer scanned beams was established, while for unmodulated scattered beams experimental data were used. From all the data, chamber factors,fQ,and chamber perturbation correction factors,pQ,were then derived and analysed.Main results. The analysis showed that except for the beam quality dependence of the water-to-air mass stopping power ratio and, for cylindrical ionization chambers in unmodulated beams, of the displacement correction factor, there is no remaining beam quality dependence of the chamber perturbation correction factorspQ.Based on this approach, average values of the beam quality independent part of the perturbation factors were derived to calculatekQvalues consistent with the data in the literature.Significance. The resulting data from this analysis are current best estimates ofkQvalues for modulated scattered beams and single-layer scanned beams used in proton therapy. Based on this, a single set of harmonized values is derived to be recommended in the update of IAEA TRS-398.

On the measurement uncertainty of microdosimetric quantities using diamond and silicon microdosimeters in carbon-ion beams.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to compare the response of two different types of solid-state microdosimeters, that is, silicon and diamond, and their uncertainties. A study of the conversion of silicon microdosimetric spectra to the diamond equivalent for microdosimeters with different geometry of the sensitive volumes is performed, including the use of different stopping power databases. METHOD: Diamond and silicon microdosimeters were irradiated under the same conditions, aligned at the same depth in a carbon-ion beam at the MedAustron ion therapy center. In order to estimate the microdosimetric quantities, the readout electronic linearity was investigated with three different methods, that is, the first being a single linear regression, the second consisting of a double linear regression with a channel transition and last a multiple linear regression by splitting the data into odd and even groups. The uncertainty related to each of these methods was estimated as well. The edge calibration was performed using the intercept with the horizontal axis of the tangent through the inflection point of the Fermi function approximation multi-channel analyzer spectrum. It was assumed that this point corresponds to the maximum energy difference of particle traversing the sensitive volume (SV) for which the residual range difference in the continuous slowing down approximation is equal to the thickness of the SV of the microdosimeter. Four material conversion methods were explored, the edge method, the density method, the maximum-deposition energy method and the bin-by-bin transformation method. The uncertainties of the microdosimetric quantities resulting from the linearization, the edge calibration and the detectors thickness were also estimated. RESULTS: It was found that the double linear regression had the lowest uncertainty for both microdosimeters. The propagated standard (k = 1) uncertainties on the frequency-mean lineal energy y ¯ F ${\bar{y}}_{\rm{F}}$ and the dose-mean lineal energy y ¯ D ${\bar{y}}_{\rm{D}}$ values from the marker point, in the spectra, in the plateau were 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively, for the diamond microdosimeter, whilst for the silicon microdosimeter data converted to diamond, the uncertainty was estimated to be 0.1%. In the range corresponding to the 90% of the amplitude of the Bragg Peak at the distal part of the Bragg curve (R90 ) the uncertainty was found to be 0.1%. The uncertainty propagation from the stopping power tables was estimated to be between 5% and 7% depending on the method. The uncertainty on the y ¯ F ${\bar{y}}_{\rm{F}}$ and y ¯ D ${\bar{y}}_{\rm{D}}$ coming from the thickness of the detectors varied between 0.3% and 0.5%. CONCLUSION: This article demonstrate that the linearity of the readout electronics affects the microdosimetric spectra with a difference in y ¯ F ${\bar{y}}_{\rm{F}}$ values between the different linearization methods of up to 17.5%. The combined uncertainty was dominated by the uncertainty of stopping power on the edge.

Accelerating and improving radiochromic film calibration by utilizing the dose ratio in photon and proton beams.

PURPOSE: Radiochromic films are versatile 2D dosimeters with high-resolution and near tissue equivalence. To assure high precision and accuracy, a time-consuming calibration process is required. To improve the time efficiency, a novel calibration method utilizing the ratio of the same dose profile measured at different monitor units (MUs) is introduced and tested in a proton and photon beam. METHODS: The calibration procedure employs the dose ratio of film measurements of the same relative profile for different absolute dose values. Hence, the ratio of the dose is constant at any point of the profile, but the ratio of the net optical densities is not constant. The key idea of the method is to optimize the calibration function until the ratio of the calculated doses is constant. The proposed method was tested in the dose range between 0.25-12 and 1-6 Gy in a proton and photon beam, respectively. A radial symmetric profile and a rectangular profile were created, both having a central plateau region of about 3 cm diameter and a dose falloff of about 1.5 cm at larger distances. The dose falloff region was used as input for the optimization method and the central plateau region served as dose reference points. Only the plateau region of the highest dose entered the optimization as an additional objective. The measured data were randomly split into differently sized training and test sets. The optimization was repeated 1000 times with random start value initialization using the same start values for the standard and the gradient method. Finally, a proton plan with four dose levels was created, which were separated spatially, to test the possibility of a full calibration within a single measurement. RESULTS: Parameter estimation was possible with as low as one dose ratio used for optimization in both the photon and the proton case, yet exhibiting a high sensitivity on the dose level. The root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of the dose was less than 1% when the dose ratio was in the order of 20, whereas the median RMSD of all optimizations was 1.7%. Using four dose levels for optimization resulted in a median RMSD of 1% when randomly selecting the dose levels. Having at least one dose ratio of about 20 included in the optimization considerably improved the RMSD of the calibration function. Using six or eight dose levels reduced the sensitivity on the dose level selection and the median RMSD was 0.8%. A full calibration was possible in a single measurement having four dose levels in one plan but spatially separated. CONCLUSIONS: The number of measurements required to obtain an EBT3 film calibration function could be reduced using the proposed dose ratio method while maintaining the same accuracy as with the standard method.

Experimental determination ofkQfactors for two types of ionization chambers in scanned proton beams.

Objective.Experimental determination of beam qualitykQfactors for two types of Farmer ionization chambers, NE2571 and IBA FC65-G, in a scanned proton beam for three nominal energies (140 MeV, 180 MeV and 220 MeV) based on water calorimetry.Approach.Beam quality correction factors were determined comparing the results obtained with water calorimetry and ionometry. Water calorimetry was performed to determine the absorbed dose at a depth of measurement in water of 5 g cm-2, limited by the extension of the calorimeter glass vessel used. For the ionometry, two chambers of each type were included in the study. The ionization chambers were calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in60Co at the Swedish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, directly traceable to the BIPM, and were used according to the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice.Main results. ThekQvalues determined in the present work have been compared with the values tabulated in TRS-398 and its forthcoming update and also with those obtained in previous water calorimetric measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. All results were found to agree within the combined uncertainties of the different data.Significance. It is expected that the present work will serve as an experimental contribution tokQ-factors for the two chamber types and three scanned proton beam qualities used.

Technical note: Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement of the PTW-31010 ionization chamber in proton and carbon ion beams.

PURPOSE: The accurate knowledge of the effective point of measurement (Peff ) is particularly important for measurements in proximity to high dose gradients such as in the distal fall-off of particle beams. For plane-parallel ionization chambers (ICs), Peff is well known and located at the center of the inner surface of the entrance window. For cylindrical ICs, Peff is shifted from the chamber's center toward the beam source. According to IAEA TRS-398, this shift can be calculated as 0.75·rcyl for light ions with rcyl being the radius of the cavity. For proton beams and in absence of a dose gradient, no shift is recommended. We have experimentally determined Peff for the 0.125 cc Semiflex IC in both proton and carbon ion beams. METHODS: The first method consisted of simultaneous irradiation of a plane-parallel IC and the Semiflex in a 4-cm wide spread-out Bragg peak. In the second method, a single-energy beam was used, and both ICs were positioned successively at the same measurement depths. For both approaches, the shift of the distal edge of the depth ionization distributions recorded by the two chambers at different reference points was used to calculate Peff of the Semiflex. Both methods were applied in carbon ion beams, and only the latter was applied in proton beams. RESULTS: Both methods yielded a similar Peff for carbon ions, 0.88·rcyl , and 0.84·rcyl , which results in a difference of only 0.1 mm. The difference to the recommended value of 0.75·rcyl is 0.4 and 0.3 mm, respectively, which is larger than the positioning uncertainty. In the proton beam, a Peff of 0.92·rcyl was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The Peff for the 0.125 cc Semiflex IC is shifted further from the cavity center as recommended by IAEA TRS-398 for light ions, with the shift for proton beams being even larger than for carbon ion beams.

Dose calculation accuracy in particle therapy: Comparing carbon ions with protons.

PURPOSE: This work presents the validation of an analytical pencil beam dose calculation algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for carbon ions by measurements of dose distributions in heterogeneous phantom geometries. Additionally, a comparison study of carbon ions versus protons is performed considering current best solutions in commercial TPS. METHODS: All treatment plans were optimized and calculated using the RayStation TPS (RaySearch, Sweden). The dose distributions calculated with the TPS were compared with measurements using a 24-pinpoint ionization chamber array (T31015, PTW, Germany). Tissue-like inhomogeneities (bone, lung, and soft tissue) were embedded in water, while a target volume of 4 x 4 x 4 cm3 was defined at two different depths behind the heterogeneities. In total, 10 different test cases, with and without range shifter as well as different air gaps, were investigated. Dose distributions inside as well as behind the target volume were evaluated. RESULTS: Inside the target volume, the mean dose difference between calculations and measurements, averaged over all test cases, was 1.6% for carbon ions. This compares well to the final agreement of 1.5% obtained in water at the commissioning stage of the TPS for carbon ions and is also within the clinically acceptable interval of 3%. The mean dose difference and maximal dose difference obtained outside the target area were 1.8% and 13.4%, respectively. The agreement of dose distributions for carbon ions in the target volumes was comparable or better to that between Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations and measurements for protons. Percentage dose differences of more than 10% were present outside the target area behind bone-lung structures, where the carbon ion calculations systematically over predicted the dose. MC dose calculations for protons were superior to carbon ion beams outside the target volumes. CONCLUSION: The pencil beam dose calculations for carbon ions in RayStation were found to be in good agreement with dosimetric measurements in heterogeneous geometries for points of interest located within the target. Large local discrepancies behind the target may contribute to incorrect dose predictions for organs at risk.

Reply to comment on 'Lateral response heterogeneity of Bragg peak ionization chambers for narrow-beam photon and proton dosimetry'.

Gomà (2020Phys. Med. Biol.) commented on our paper 'Lateral response heterogeneity of Bragg peak ionization chambers for narrow-beam photon and proton dosimetry' (Kuesset al2017Phys. Med. Biol.629189-206) which describes a method to determine the response pattern of large-area ionization chambers using a collimated x-ray beam. Gomà performed a simple Monte Carlo simulation to investigate the energy transferred by secondary electrons within the detector, deducing that our conclusion, that the chamber has a non-uniform response, is not supported by our results. We appreciate the work performed by Gomà very much and believe that the transport of secondary electrons in the chamber is an important contribution to understand the non-uniformity response of large-area chambers in narrow beams. However, we disagree with the conclusions drawn by Gomà that the radial response is homogenous. His simulation actually demonstrates that the response is non-uniform in an x-ray beam.

Results of an independent dosimetry audit for scanned proton beam therapy facilities.

PURPOSE: An independent dosimetry audit based on end-to-end testing of the entire chain of radiation therapy delivery is highly recommended to ensure consistent treatments among proton therapy centers. This study presents an auditing methodology developed by the MedAustron Ion Beam Therapy Center (Austria) in collaboration with the National Physical Laboratory (UK) and audit results for five scanned proton beam therapy facilities in Europe. METHODS: The audit procedure used a homogeneous and an anthropomorphic head phantom. The phantoms were loaded either with an ionization chamber or with alanine pellets and radiochromic films. Homogeneously planned doses of 10Gy were delivered to a box-like target volume in the homogeneous phantom and to two clinical scenarios with increasing complexity in the head phantom. RESULTS: For all tests the mean of the local differences of the absolute dose to water determined with the alanine pellets compared to the predicted dose from the treatment planning system installed at the audited institution was determined. The mean value taken over all tests performed was -0.1±1.0%. The measurements carried out with the ionization chamber were consistent with the dose determined by the alanine pellets with a mean deviation of -0.5±0.6%. CONCLUSION: The developed dosimetry audit method was successfully applied at five proton centers including various "turn-key" Cyclotron solutions by IBA, Varian and Mevion. This independent audit with extension to other tumour sites and use of the correspondent anthropomorphic phantoms may be proposed as part of a credentialing procedure for future clinical trials in proton beam therapy.

Correction of the measured current of a small-gap plane-parallel ionization chamber in proton beams in the presence of charge multiplication.

PURPOSE: The aims of this work are to study the response of a small-gap plane-parallel ionization chamber in the presence of charge multiplication and suggest an experimental method to determine the product of the recombination correction factor (ks) and the charge multiplication correction factor (kCM) in order to investigate the latter. METHODS: Experimental data were acquired in scanned proton beams and in a Cobalt-60 beam. Measurements were carried out using an IBA PPC05 chambers of which the electrode gap is 0.6mm. The study is based on the determination of Jaffé plots by operating the chambers at different voltages. Experimental results are compared to theoretical equations describing initial and volume recombination as well as charge multiplication for continuous and pulsed beams. RESULTS: Results obtained in protons and Cobalt-60 with the same PPC05 chamber indicate that the charge multiplication effect is independent of the beam quality, while results obtained in different proton beams with two different PPC05 chambers show that the charge multiplication effect is chamber dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to be taken when using a small-gap plane-parallel ionization chamber with a high voltage (e.g. 300V or 500V) for reference dosimetry in scanned proton beams depends on which correction factors were applied to the chamber response during its calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water: In both cases, it is recommended to use the ionization chamber at the same operating voltage used during its ND,w-calibration. Another solution consists of operating the PPC05 chamber at a lower voltage (e.g. 50V) with larger ks and smaller kCM and determining the product of both factors with higher accuracy using a linear extrapolation method.

Monte Carlo computation of 3D distributions of stopping power ratios in light ion beam therapy using GATE-RTion.

PURPOSE: This paper presents a novel method for the calculation of three-dimensional (3D) Bragg-Gray water-to-detector stopping power ratio (sw,det ) distributions for proton and carbon ion beams. METHODS: Contrary to previously published fluence-based calculations of the stopping power ratio, the sw,det calculation method used in this work is based on the specific way GATE/Geant4 scores the energy deposition. It only requires the use of the so-called DoseActor, as available in GATE, for the calculation of the sw,det at any point of a 3D dose distribution. The simulations are performed using GATE-RTion v1.0, a dedicated GATE release that was validated for the clinical use in light ion beam therapy. RESULTS: The Bragg-Gray water-to-air stopping power ratio (sw,air ) was calculated for monoenergetic proton and carbon ion beams with the default stopping power data in GATE-RTion v1.0 and the new ICRU90 recommendation. The sw,air differences between the use of the default and the ICRU90 configuration were 0.6% and 5.4% at the physical range (R80 - 80% dose level in the distal dose fall-off) for a 70 MeV proton beam and a 120 MeV/u carbon ion beam, respectively. For protons, the sw,det results for lithium fluoride, silicon, gadolinium oxysulfide, and the active layer material of EBT2 (radiochromic film) were compared with the literature and a reasonable agreement was found. For a real patient treatment plan, the 3D distributions of sw,det in proton beams were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: Our method was validated by comparison with available literature data. Its equivalence with Bragg-Gray cavity theory was demonstrated mathematically. The capability of GATE-RTion v1.0 for the sw,det calculation at any point of a 3D dose distribution for simple and complex proton and carbon ion plans was presented.